A murky outlook for Ukraine aid with U.S. House leadership in turmoil

Additional military and humanitarian aid for Ukraine was
on shaky ground earlier this week, before U.S. House Republicans
evicted Kevin McCarthy from the speaker’s office.

The revolt by eight members of the House GOP Conference, largely
spurred by bipartisan deals McCarthy struck on the debt limit and a
short-term government funding bill, complicated prospects for moving
additional aid to Ukraine through Congress.

Future relief dollars are now closely tied to who House Republicans elect as their next speaker. The mid-session contest for the gavel
currently pits Louisiana’s Steve Scalise against Ohio’s Jim Jordan,
though more GOP lawmakers are mulling campaigns to lead their party. An
election could be as soon as next week though that’s not certain.

The two lawmakers have slightly different records on Ukraine, with
Scalise having supported relief funding in the beginning, while Jordan
voted against all the bills that included military and humanitarian

Senate backing continues

In the U.S. Senate, both Republicans and Democrats say they’re
looking for a path to keep Ukraine in Ukrainian hands and resist the
Russian military onslaught to end democracy in the Eastern European

Montana Democratic Sen. Jon Tester, chair of the Defense spending
panel, said there is likely a path forward for Ukraine aid, despite
House GOP infighting.

“I think you’ve got to continue to work in a positive way in the
Senate,” Tester said. “And I think, as I told people in the caucus this
morning, it’ll always be a s- – – show over there, so let’s do our job.”

Indiana Republican Sen. Mike Braun said any aid for Ukraine will likely be tied to additional funding for border security.

“I think that would unite our conference for the ones that have been
lukewarm on Ukraine — thinking that the top priority should be the
border. And I think that’s the way it gets through,” Braun said.

“And then the next issue would be for any of us that are fiscal conservatives — are you going to actually pay for it?” he added.

The change in House Republican leadership shouldn’t impact those discussions, Braun said.

Virginia Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine said there are enough votes to
pass Ukraine aid in the House if the next GOP speaker puts a bipartisan
bill on the floor.

“My hope is that we’ll do something significant and bipartisan in the
Senate and we may be able to act first to sort of lead the way,” Kaine

The next Ukraine aid bill to go to the Senate floor, Kaine said, will
likely be structured to provide longer term aid to the country, saying
there’s a “logic” to that proposal.

“Rather than try to do this in small bites that make it harder and
harder and harder. Let’s just be candid with people about what the
longer term need is and see if we could do it,” Kaine said. “And we do
think we’ve got the votes in both houses.”

Iowa Republican Sen. Joni Ernst, who sits on the Armed Services
Committee, said Wednesday there were no updates on negotiations over
military aid to Ukraine.

“We’re going to have to work it with the House obviously, so we’ll
see,” Ernst said, deferring to House lawmakers on how a change in
leadership could impact prospects in that chamber.

Kansas Republican Sen. Jerry Moran, a senior appropriator, said
discussions about providing aid for Ukraine and approving additional
money for border security are moving on a separate track from
conversations about getting all dozen of the full-year spending bills

Deadline for new spending bill

The deadline for funding the government or passing a second stopgap
spending bill is Nov. 17, though that timeline wouldn’t impact
negotiations on Ukraine and border security — unless party leaders
decide to roll them into one package as they have in the past.

The typical conference process, where House and Senate lawmakers meet
to reconcile the differences on legislation, cannot begin until the
House GOP decides who leads the party, Moran said.

Conferencing bills, he said, “suggests that someone has the ability
to negotiate and work on behalf of the House, which yet has to be

“It’s a huge challenge but we can compromise on numbers. That’s among
the easiest things to do,” Moran said of the full-year government
spending bills. “It’s the policy kinds of things that make conference
more difficult.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, and Senate
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, have pledged to
provide more relief funding to Ukraine, though those plans were already in trouble before McCarthy’s removal as speaker.

Scalise and Jordan’s records

Congress has approved four relief packages for Ukraine so far,
totaling more than $110 billion in military, economic and humanitarian
support. The funding has gone to departments and agencies run by the
U.S. government, including the Defense and State departments.

The first aid bill,
enacted in March 2022, included $13.6 billion. The funding was added to
a $1.5 trillion spending package that included all 12 of the annual
government spending measures, but the House used a procedural tool,
called “dividing the question,” to take two votes on the package.

The vote
on the portions that included military aid to Ukraine as well as other
items, got Scalise’s vote, but not Jordan’s support. Both men voted against passing the sections of the package that provided non-military assistance to Ukraine and held numerous other bills.

The second assistance package, passed in May 2022, appropriated $40 billion. Scalise voted for aid while Jordan voted against the bill.

The third relief package, cleared in September 2022, provided more than $12 billion. Both men voted
against the legislation, which included a stopgap spending bill,
billions in natural disaster relief and increased funding for the Low
Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

The fourth supplemental package, enacted in December 2022, included $45 billion. Both Scalise and Jordan voted against approving the package, which also included all of the full-year government spending bills and other provisions.

Scalise, unlike Jordan, originally backed funding for Ukraine and
wrote in a statement alongside other House GOP leaders in February 2022
that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was “reprehensible.”

“We stand in complete solidarity with the innocent Ukrainian people
and vow to continue to support them as they defend themselves from
Putin’s unprovoked onslaught,” they wrote.

The group of six GOP leaders said that China, Iran and North Korea
were watching how the United States would respond to Russia’s war
against Ukraine. “They must see us respond firmly to this Russian